0%

Case study By the MySchoolOS™ team · · · 11 min read

Key takeaways

  • This is an industry case study built on public data. It is not a customer story and contains no invented results.
  • Indian students report high exam and results anxiety, and the Supreme Court issued mental health guidelines for educational institutions in July 2025.
  • Software cannot replace counsellors or care. It can give teachers one clear picture of a student’s progress sooner, so a human conversation can start earlier.

Frequently asked questions

No. It is an industry case study built on public data, with a clearly labelled illustrative scenario. No customer results are claimed.

Software cannot remove stress. It can help staff notice patterns in marks and attendance sooner, so a caring conversation can start earlier. Counselling and support come from people.

Yes. Teachers can see a student’s progress in one place instead of comparing marksheets by hand. Availability depends on your plan.

Where your plan includes AI, it works only from your own school’s data. Ask us in a demo how your school’s data is protected.

Sources

Figures are public and reported as cited. Please check the original publication before relying on a number.

  1. UDISE+ 2024-25: schools, enrolment, teachers (educationforallinindia.com)
  2. Single-teacher schools, UDISE+ 2024-25 analysis
  3. NCERT mental health survey: exams a key source of anxiety (Down To Earth)
  4. NCERT survey: board exam and admissions anxiety (Careers360)
  5. NCRB data on student suicides (Free Press Journal)
  6. Supreme Court guidelines, Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2025 (Verdictum)